Textile CETP · ZLD reference installation
← All case studies

Textile CETP · ZLD

150 MLD textile CETP — one RO train retrofitted to HDG, flow stabilised

A 150 MLD CETP treating high-COD textile effluent from 30+ dyeing, printing and technical textile units and recycling 25 MLD — running to a Zero Liquid Discharge mandate.

Client
Gujarat Eco Textile Park (GETP)
Location
Palsana, Surat, Gujarat, India
Product
SV-NanoMetrix™ FR8040-355LD (HDG)
Period
March–April 2026

Client-ready summary with charts and plant data tables.

165 m³/hr

Stabilised permeate flow (per train)

50%

CIP frequency reduction

95.0%

System availability

138%

5-year ROI

Background

Gujarat Eco Textile Park in Surat spans 104 acres and hosts more than 30 operational units across dyeing, printing and technical textiles. Its 150 MLD Common Effluent Treatment Plant treats the cluster's effluent and recycles 25 MLD, the backbone of the park's Zero Liquid Discharge commitment.

The recycle stream passes through an RO system of 10 trains, each holding 350 elements — 3,500 in total. Until this trial every train ran conventional 400 sq. ft. FR membranes on a narrow feed channel, marketed as fouling-resistant but unable to hold up against the aggressive organic, colloidal and dye load of textile effluent.

SV-NanoMetrix™ replaced the elements in one train with the FR8040-355LD model using HDG — Hydrodynamic Channel Geometrics — and ran it under identical operating conditions against the nine unchanged trains.

The challenge

  • Product flow collapsed from 200 m³/hr to 140 m³/hr within the first 24 hours of operation.
  • Flow continued declining to 100–110 m³/hr just 48 hours after each cleaning — no stable operating window.
  • Clean-In-Place was required every 48 hours: 182 CIP events, 944 hours of downtime and ₹28.5 lakhs of annual operating expenditure.
  • Accelerated element degradation and chemical consumption made the ZLD target economically unsustainable.

The solution

SV-NanoMetrix™ supplied FR8040-355LD elements engineered specifically for extreme, high-fouling industrial duty. The performance gap is architectural, not incremental: HDG open-channel geometry raises cross-flow shear and lowers pressure drop, while Thermo-FR™ surface chemistry keeps organic dyes, surfactants and biofoulants from adsorbing to the active layer in the first place.

The changeover used the existing pressure vessels and array — no mechanical modification, no process redesign — and was commissioned under SVJPL technical supervision.

Engineering features

  • Thermo-FR™ Surface Shield — hydrophilic, near-neutral surface that resists dye and biological attachment.
  • HDG — Hydrodynamic Channel Geometrics: open, symmetric feed channel for stable shear, lower ΔP and lower concentration polarization.
  • Selective Layer Architecture tuned for 99.5–99.7% NaCl rejection at high-fouling feed conditions.
  • Continuous pH 2.0–12.0 tolerance with CIP down to pH 1.0 and up to pH 13.0.

Results & plant data

Flux decline vs operating time

0501001502000102024487296Operating time (hours)
Conventional 400 sq. ft. FR SV-NanoMetrix™ FR8040-355LD (HDG) (m³/hr)
Before vs after — plant performance
ParameterBeforeAfterImprovement
CIP frequencyEvery 48 hoursEvery 96 hours50% reduction
Product flow (24 h)140 m³/hr165 m³/hr+18%
Product flow (48 h)100–110 m³/hr165 m³/hr+50%
Flow stabilityDeclined continuouslyConstant at 165 m³/hrFully stabilised
Recovery rate75%75%Consistent
Feed pressure17 bar17 barStable, no pressure creep
Technical specification comparison
SpecificationSV-NanoMetrix™ FR8040-355LD (HDG)Conventional 400 sq. ft. FRAdvantage
Membrane typeTFC polyamide (NanoMatrix™ surface)TFC polyamide (standard FR)Enhanced surface
Feed channelHDG open channel (low differential)Conventional narrow channelWider, higher-shear channel
Active area355 ft² (33 m²)400 ft² (37.2 m²)Optimised for fouling resistance
NaCl rejection99.5–99.7%99.0–99.5%+0.2–0.5%
Max operating pressure600 psi (41 bar)600 psi (41 bar)Equivalent
pH range (continuous)2.0 – 12.02.0 – 11.0Wider pH tolerance
Feed NTU tolerance< 5 NTU< 1 NTU5× higher tolerance
Concentration polarizationLow (HDG geometry)ModerateReduced fouling
Typical CIP interval96 hours48 hours2× longer
Flow stability (48 h)165 m³/hr constant100–110 m³/hr declining+50% higher
Differential pressure vs feed turbidity
Feed turbidity (NTU)SV-NanoMetrix™ ΔP (bar)Conventional 400 sq. ft. FR ΔP (bar)
00.50.5
21.01.5
41.83.0
62.55.0

Salt rejection stayed above 99% up to 6 bar differential pressure, while the conventional element dropped below 98% under identical conditions.

Annual operational impact
MetricConventional 400 sq. ft. FRSV-NanoMetrix™ FR8040-355LD (HDG)
CIP events per year18291
Downtime (hours/year)728364
CIP chemical cost (₹ lakhs)189
System availability89.2%95.0%
Recovered productive time508 hours/year
Cumulative total cost of ownership (₹ lakhs)
YearConventional 400 sq. ft. FRSV-NanoMetrix™
042.036.0
156.056.0
293.073.0
3121.089.0

Five-year net saving exceeds ₹55 lakhs with a 138% return on investment.

Operational impact

  • Downtime halved — CIP interval doubled from 48 to 96 hours, recovering 508 productive hours per year.
  • Recovery held at 75%, directly supporting the park's ZLD balance.
  • Feed pressure stable at 17 bar with no pressure creep, protecting specific energy consumption.
  • Slower fouling rate through HDG geometry, expected to significantly extend element service life.
  • Reliable 150 MLD operation for the entire textile cluster.

By eliminating the drastic first-48-hour flow decline, the plant now runs at a constant 165 m³/hr permeate flow with half the cleaning burden and unchanged 75% recovery — a dependable hydraulic foundation for the park's Zero Liquid Discharge programme.

Conclusion — Gujarat Eco Textile Park (GETP), Palsana, Surat, Gujarat, India

Want this result on your plant?

Send your feedwater analysis, array configuration and cleaning history — we will model the duty and propose a side-by-side trial.

Request a quote